Management of the multidisciplinary in the sustainable project
Keywords:
Sustainability, Risk, Architecture, Industrial design, Green EngineeringAbstract
For many years, the treatment of environmental and social issues in Engineering, Architecture and Design has been characterized by an enormous conceptual and methodological diversity. Several, and even identical, issues are being treated in different áreas in isolation, with little multidisciplinary approach. This research seeks the theoretical foundations for a management of sustainability in the Project disciplines that refers to the conceptual roots from which it is possible to draw common aproaches and interdisciplinary fields of work. Base don the Principles of Green Engineering and Risk Management, our proposal is an exploration in common aspects that promote mutual learning, from the Inherently Safer Design proposed by Trevor Kletz to a variety of proposals of Sustainable Architecture, Ecodesign and Design for Sustainibility.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abraham, M., & Nguyen, M. (2003). Green Engineering: Defining the Principles. Results from the Sandestin Conference (233-236). Environmental Progress 22 (4).
Anastas, P.T. (2003). Design through the 12 principles of Green Engineering. Environmental Science and Technology, 94.
Anastas, P.Z. (2003). Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering. American Chemical Society - environmental science & technology - March 1, 2003, 95-101.
Anastas, P., Wood-Black, F., Masciangioli, T., & McGowan, E.A.E. (2007). Exploring Opportunities in Green Chemistry and Engineering Education: A Workshop Summary to the Chemical Sciences Roundtable. NY: Chemical Sciences Roundtable - National Academies Press.
Beccari, B. (2016). A comparative Analylis of Disaster, Risk. Vulnerability and Resilience Composite Indicators. PLOS Currents Disasters, 1-58.
Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Disasters - Towards Disaster-resilient societies. Tokio: United Nations University Press.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O., & Carreño, M.A. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Natural Hazards 67, 193–211.
Byggeth, S.A. (2006). Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1420-1430.
Byggeth, S., & Hochschorner, E. (2006). Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 1420-1430.
Canale, G. (04 de 07 de 2012). Indicadores para el Desempeño en Seguridad de Procesos -Experiencia en Talleres de divulgación. Primeras Jornadas Argentinas de Seguridad de Procesos - Ponencias. Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Ingenieros Químicos.
Cardona, O.M. (2012). Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. En C. V. Field, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (págs. 65-108). Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA,: Cambridge University Press.
Cardona, O.M. (2004). The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management. Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people, 17.
Edwards, A.R. (2005). The Sustainability Revolution. Portrait of a Paradigm shift. Gabriola Island. Canada: New Society Publishers.
Gallopín, G. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 293-303.
Habermas, J. (1991). Escritos sobre moralidad y eticidad. 1° Edición. Barcelona: Paidós. Pensamiento contemporáneo 17.
Habermas, J. (1985). Ética del discurso. Notas sobre un programa de fundamentación. 57-134. Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa,.
Hendershot, D. (2004). Section IV - Inherently Safer Design. In J. R. Phimister, & V. M. Bier, Accident Precursor Analysis and Management - Reducing Technological Risk Through Dilligence (pp. 103 - 117). Washington: National Academy Press.
Kletz, T. &. (2010). Process Plants. A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design 2nd Ed. New York: CRC Press.
Kletz, T.A. (1978). What you don´t have, can’t leak. Chemistry and Industry, 287-292.
Lancker, E.N. (2000). A policy scenario analysis of sustainable agricultural development options: a case study for Nepal. Impact Assessment and Project, 111 - 124.
Luttropp, C., & Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1396-1408.
McDonough, W. (1992). The Hannover Principles: Design for Sustainability. New York: William McDonough Architects.
McDonough, W., Braungart, M., & Anastas, P.T. (2003). Aplying the principles of Green Engineering to Cradle-to-Cradle Design. Environmental Science & Technology 37(23), 434A - 441A.
Meyer, T.A. (2016). Engineering Risk Management. 2nd.. Edition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GMBH.
OECD (2008). Guidance On Developing Safety Performance Indicators related to Chemical Accident Prevention. Paris: OECD Environmental Directorate.
Phimister, J.R., & Bier, V.M. (2004). Accident Precursor Analysis and Management. Reducing Technological Risk through Dilligence. Washington: National Academy of Engineering.
Ryn, S.V. (2007). Ecological Design. Tenth anniversary Edition. Washington: Island Press.
Singh, R.K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15, 281-299.
United Nations DESA. (2001). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies - 3rd Edition. New York: United Nations ISBN 978-92-1-104577-2.
United Nations (1996). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies. New York: United Nations Dept. for Policy Coordination & Sustainable Development.
Vallero, D.A. (2008). Sustainable Design: The Science of Sustainability and Green Engineering. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Vezzoli, C.A. (2010). Design for Environmental Sustainability. London: Springer - Verlag.
Wasley, J. (2005). Reflections on the lessons of the Chemically Sensitive. En S. &. Guy, Sustainable Architectures: Critical Explorations of Green Building Practices. NY: Spon Press.
Anastas, P.T. (2003). Design through the 12 principles of Green Engineering. Environmental Science and Technology, 94.
Anastas, P.Z. (2003). Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering. American Chemical Society - environmental science & technology - March 1, 2003, 95-101.
Anastas, P., Wood-Black, F., Masciangioli, T., & McGowan, E.A.E. (2007). Exploring Opportunities in Green Chemistry and Engineering Education: A Workshop Summary to the Chemical Sciences Roundtable. NY: Chemical Sciences Roundtable - National Academies Press.
Beccari, B. (2016). A comparative Analylis of Disaster, Risk. Vulnerability and Resilience Composite Indicators. PLOS Currents Disasters, 1-58.
Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Disasters - Towards Disaster-resilient societies. Tokio: United Nations University Press.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O., & Carreño, M.A. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Natural Hazards 67, 193–211.
Byggeth, S.A. (2006). Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1420-1430.
Byggeth, S., & Hochschorner, E. (2006). Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 1420-1430.
Canale, G. (04 de 07 de 2012). Indicadores para el Desempeño en Seguridad de Procesos -Experiencia en Talleres de divulgación. Primeras Jornadas Argentinas de Seguridad de Procesos - Ponencias. Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Ingenieros Químicos.
Cardona, O.M. (2012). Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. En C. V. Field, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (págs. 65-108). Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA,: Cambridge University Press.
Cardona, O.M. (2004). The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management. Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people, 17.
Edwards, A.R. (2005). The Sustainability Revolution. Portrait of a Paradigm shift. Gabriola Island. Canada: New Society Publishers.
Gallopín, G. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 293-303.
Habermas, J. (1991). Escritos sobre moralidad y eticidad. 1° Edición. Barcelona: Paidós. Pensamiento contemporáneo 17.
Habermas, J. (1985). Ética del discurso. Notas sobre un programa de fundamentación. 57-134. Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa,.
Hendershot, D. (2004). Section IV - Inherently Safer Design. In J. R. Phimister, & V. M. Bier, Accident Precursor Analysis and Management - Reducing Technological Risk Through Dilligence (pp. 103 - 117). Washington: National Academy Press.
Kletz, T. &. (2010). Process Plants. A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design 2nd Ed. New York: CRC Press.
Kletz, T.A. (1978). What you don´t have, can’t leak. Chemistry and Industry, 287-292.
Lancker, E.N. (2000). A policy scenario analysis of sustainable agricultural development options: a case study for Nepal. Impact Assessment and Project, 111 - 124.
Luttropp, C., & Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1396-1408.
McDonough, W. (1992). The Hannover Principles: Design for Sustainability. New York: William McDonough Architects.
McDonough, W., Braungart, M., & Anastas, P.T. (2003). Aplying the principles of Green Engineering to Cradle-to-Cradle Design. Environmental Science & Technology 37(23), 434A - 441A.
Meyer, T.A. (2016). Engineering Risk Management. 2nd.. Edition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GMBH.
OECD (2008). Guidance On Developing Safety Performance Indicators related to Chemical Accident Prevention. Paris: OECD Environmental Directorate.
Phimister, J.R., & Bier, V.M. (2004). Accident Precursor Analysis and Management. Reducing Technological Risk through Dilligence. Washington: National Academy of Engineering.
Ryn, S.V. (2007). Ecological Design. Tenth anniversary Edition. Washington: Island Press.
Singh, R.K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15, 281-299.
United Nations DESA. (2001). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies - 3rd Edition. New York: United Nations ISBN 978-92-1-104577-2.
United Nations (1996). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies. New York: United Nations Dept. for Policy Coordination & Sustainable Development.
Vallero, D.A. (2008). Sustainable Design: The Science of Sustainability and Green Engineering. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Vezzoli, C.A. (2010). Design for Environmental Sustainability. London: Springer - Verlag.
Wasley, J. (2005). Reflections on the lessons of the Chemically Sensitive. En S. &. Guy, Sustainable Architectures: Critical Explorations of Green Building Practices. NY: Spon Press.
Downloads
Published
2018-12-21
How to Cite
Canale, G. (2018). Management of the multidisciplinary in the sustainable project. Investigación + Acción, (21), 75–95. Retrieved from https://revistasfaud.mdp.edu.ar/ia/article/view/268
Issue
Section
Artículos
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores ceden a Revista I+A de forma gratuita y no exclusiva, los derechos de reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública de su obra, autorizando asimismo su inclusión en la revista digital; su transformación, siempre que sea necesaria para permitir su preservación y uso en formato electrónico, así como para la incorporación de sistemas de seguridad y/o identificación de procedencia y el almacenamiento en servidores institucionales
- La obra estará sujeta a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons BY, que permite a terceros compartir la obra indicando su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- El/los autor/es podrá/n adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra, tanto en sus sitios web personales, en repositorios institucionales o temáticos en cualquier versión: pre-print, post print o el archivo pdf publicado en la revista, respetando la licencia de uso Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 otorgada por la revista
- El/los autor/es deberá/n declarar la originalidad del material y transferir los derechos para la publicación. No se pagarán derechos de autor.
